[HTML][HTML] Comparison of the source and prognostic utility of cfDNA in trauma and sepsis
NL Jackson Chornenki, R Coke, AC Kwong… - Intensive Care Medicine …, 2019 - Springer
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 2019•Springer
Background Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may contribute to the pathophysiology of post-
injury inflammation and coagulation in trauma. However, the source and mechanism of
release of cfDNA in trauma is not well understood. One potential source of cfDNA is from
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs), released by activated neutrophils during the process
of NETosis. The primary objective of our study was to determine if cfDNA has prognostic
utility in trauma. The secondary objective of this study was to determine the source of cfDNA …
injury inflammation and coagulation in trauma. However, the source and mechanism of
release of cfDNA in trauma is not well understood. One potential source of cfDNA is from
Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs), released by activated neutrophils during the process
of NETosis. The primary objective of our study was to determine if cfDNA has prognostic
utility in trauma. The secondary objective of this study was to determine the source of cfDNA …
Background
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may contribute to the pathophysiology of post-injury inflammation and coagulation in trauma. However, the source and mechanism of release of cfDNA in trauma is not well understood. One potential source of cfDNA is from Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs), released by activated neutrophils during the process of NETosis. The primary objective of our study was to determine if cfDNA has prognostic utility in trauma. The secondary objective of this study was to determine the source of cfDNA in trauma compared to sepsis.
Methods
We studied trauma patients from two prospective observational cohort studies: the DNA as a Prognostic Marker in ICU Patients (DYNAMICS) study and the Endotoxin in Polytrauma (ENPOLY) study. We also studied septic patients from the DYNAMICS study. Citrated plasma samples were collected longitudinally from the patients (days 1 to 7). The following molecules were measured in the plasma samples: cfDNA, protein C (PC), myeloperoxidase (MPO) (a marker of neutrophil activation), citrullinated Histone H3 (H3Cit, a marker of NETosis), cyclophilin A (a marker of necrosis), and caspase-cleaved K18 (a marker of apoptosis).
Results
A total of 77 trauma patients were included (n = 38 from DYNAMICS and n = 39 from ENPOLY). The median age was 49 years; 27.3% were female, and mortality was 16.9% at 28 days. Levels of cfDNA were elevated compared to healthy values but not significantly different between survivors and non-survivors. There was a positive correlation between MPO and cfDNA in septic patients (r = 0.424, p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no correlation between MPO and cfDNA in trauma patients (r = – 0.192, p = 0.115). Levels of H3Cit, a marker of NETosis, were significantly elevated in septic patients compared to trauma patients (p < 0.01) while apoptosis and necrosis markers did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusion
Our studies suggest that the source and mechanism of release of cfDNA differ between trauma and sepsis patients. In sepsis, cfDNA is likely primarily released by activated neutrophils via the process of NETosis. In contrast, cfDNA in trauma appears to originate mainly from injured or necrotic cells. Although cfDNA is elevated in trauma and sepsis patients compared to healthy controls, cfDNA does not appear to have prognostic utility in trauma patients.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01355042 . Registered May 17, 2011
Springer
